Leadership In The Truest Sense

The ever present question is… “What” is leadership?

 

At the beginning of our Leadership Academy programs and workshops, the very first question that I typically open up for discussion is… What is leadership? To no surprise, the opinions about what leadership “is” are as varied as the number of people present in the room.

The factual reality is that leadership is in application invariably one thing… “situational”. You need only think back to the countless number of true war stories, books and movies that cite the bravery and leadership of everyday soldiers, airmen, sailors and marines whose combat unit was cornered and in the ensuing firefight, their ranking officers were taken out.

Yet, in the midst of these horrendous situations, there were ordinary service men and woman who stepped forward to take charge of the few remaining troops and then lead them on to heroic victory against overwhelming odds and circumstances.

Although these courageous individuals were without appropriate leadership development training, prerequisite skills or experience, they did possess the key attribute that was required in their respective circumstances… a situational “mindset”.

These individuals weren’t willing to lose the battle. Rather, they were willing to step up, step out and immediately take charge of the situation. They had a mindset that was determined to find a way to protect their comrades and then win the conflict no matter what.

This is exactly why every day citizens run into burning buildings, pull people out of burning automobiles and off of train tracks. They respond to the situation at hand and do what absolutely has to be done without ever thinking twice or blinking an eye. They are willing and comfortable about taking on the situation that is in front of them at that given moment.  

Leadership in its truest sense is ultimately not about titles, positions or even invested authority from an organization.. Authentic leadership is about being willing to make a difference no matter what situation confronts you, your people and your organization..

Are the people in your organization who hold positions of responsibility as supervisors, managers, department heads or members of your executive team appropriately prepared to effectively respond to the “situations” that will inevitably unfold within your organization on a day to day basis?

More importantly, does your organization keep reliving the same situations over and over again?

While many of the common situations in most organizations do tend be repetitive, the more crucial situations are the ones that are unanticipated and occur suddenly without warning.

Consider the situation that James F. Parker was unexpectedly confronted with after only a few months on the job as the new CEO of Southwest Airlines… the tragic events of September 11, 2001. In a mere instant, all airlines in the U.S were immediately grounded for many days, while stranding hordes of passengers and flight crews wherever they randomly happened to be at that given moment.

While the remainder of the airline industry simply sat idly by and waited for further instructions from the government. CEO Parker immediately directed the staff of Southwest Airlines to do everything possible to address the needs of Southwest’s passengers. Among numerous activities, Southwest Airlines employees even went so far as to take their customers bowling and to the movies.

In another situation when an elderly woman’s son who was to drive from Tucson, Arizona to meet his mom in Phoenix was seriously injured in a car crash, while making every attempt to so, Southwest was unsuccessful in booking her passage on another airline, as Southwest didn’t fly into Tucson. When the women landed in Phoenix, a Southwest employee without hesitation went to the employee parking lot, got his car and proceeded to drive the elderly woman over 100 miles to Tucson and her injured son.

What CEO Parker successfully helped his people to understand is that there is a direct correlation between leadership and customer service as they are both “situational”. Moreover, it is this level of comprehension for what leadership “is” that has earned Southwest the reputation for always putting the customer first… no matter what the situation.

As your valued resource partner, we stand ready to assist your organization in developing its situational leadership and helping your people to… Learn more… Do more… Become more.

Copyright © 2015 Developing Forward | Thomas H. Swank, CBC

People: Manage or Lead?

Years ago when our children were young, during our visit to the Epcot Center we encountered a futuristic transportation exhibit which was titled “People-Movers”. The concept pertained to how to manage the movement of large masses of people between destinations in the future.

 

In more recent times, I have encountered a somewhat similar business term referred to as “People Managers”. In a number of instances, I’ve seen this term translated as being interchangeable with Human Resource Management.

 

One of the resources I encountered on this subject stated that there were 7 specific categories of function associated with people management. More specifically, they were identified as:

 

Employee Motivation

Manage Yourself
Giving Feedback
Managing in Wartime
Organizing People  
Team Building
Recruiting and Hiring

Of the seven people management categories cited above, only recruiting and hiring are truly HR functions.

Over the course of the past decade or so, and with the aid of ever advancing technology, more and more organizations have succumbed to the practice of micromanaging every aspect of their organization including their greatest asset… their “people”.

 

All the while, companies are employing more and more robotic technology into their operations, which is at the same time serving to dehumanize/devalue their people through either job elimination,  micromanagement or people managing.

 

This should be the red flag that raises the salient question… Should people be managed or led?

 

I for one believe that people should be “led”. There are a number of reasons that I choose to take this position:

 

Employee performance is first and foremost rooted in personal “attitudes” which will ultimately result in your organization’s success or failure. It’s certainly not difficult to grasp the concept that you will attract better results with honey (leadership), than vinegar (micromanaging people).

 

Every individual has their own unique set of values & beliefs, thought patterns and personal attributes. Given the facts of human nature, none of these factors can in fact be managed by another human being. Moreover, you will be going against the grain of both the individual and organizational productivity if you try to. It would be equivalent to trying to have every employee have the same pattern of heartbeats and heart rate.

 

The single greatest issue with employee turnover and diversity in the workplace is the strong sense of not being “valued”. The truth of the matter is that people don’t want to be managed. What they truly and dearly want is to be valued and accepted as a viable member of a team.

 

How many times does industry, business and government have to practice top-down enforcement practices of rules, policies and procedures before they finally realize that it simply doesn’t get people to do great work or produce great results. To the contrary, managing people literally cripples the organization, stifles imaginations and kills creativity, for which the eventual outcome is a failure to innovate.

 

In observing and working with highly successful organizations throughout my career, I have observed many types of managers such as sales managers, production managers and office managers to name a few. As “managers”, their direct responsibility was to manage the work flow of their respective department, manage the assignment of work tasks and facilitate the directives of the organization’s executive team. Their job as a manager was entirely about managing the “processes” that made the organization’s wheels turn and which in turn generated the desired results as dictated by the organization’s vision and mission.

 

Regardless of the future destination that you are driving your organization toward, the principle for organizational success has not in spite of technological advancement changed.

 

Sharpen your focus on managing your processes, developing your talent base (people) and create future leaders that will take your organization where it wants to go.

 

As your valued resource partner, we stand ready to assist your organization, its leadership and your people to… Learn more… Do more… Become more.

 

Copyright © 2015 Developing Forward | Thomas H. Swank, CBC

When Talent Walks Out The Door

Have you ever lost an employee that you didn’t want to lose or possibly couldn’t afford to lose?

For most organizations, the material costs of employee turnover are more than evident. According to the Society for Human Resource Management (SHRM), its cost estimate for replacing a salaried employee is between six and nine months of that employee’s salary on average.

The SHRM cost estimate may actually fall at the lower end of loss scale, as other industry experts and economists state that replacing a talented employee can cost as much as two times their annual salary.

Regardless of where you exactly peg it, the replacement cost that occurs when talent walks out the door is huge. Moreover, the important caveat here is that this is only the “replacement” cost. While the material/financial costs of employee turnover are clearly substantial, there should be an equal and commensurate focus on the intangible cost to your organization from the ripple effect that talent loss permeates throughout the organization.

The ripple effect ever so subtlety makes it way to the shores that stretch from the boardroom to the boiler room. Executives begin asking… “What is causing our organization to keep losing such talented people, especially after the substantial investment that we have made in them.”  All the while, front line employees throughout the organization are asking “Why did John Smith suddenly decide to leave the organization?”

These are upfront questions that could be considered normal, reasonable and to some degree predictable. Of course, every organization has its culture and its internal grapevine. So before long, reasonable questions turn into rumors and speculation that ultimately lack substance.

Let’s be honest here… It’s no secret that employees in mass recognize the talents and abilities of their fellow peers. And when a talented individual chooses to jump ship, it is most assuredly going to raise the question “why”. However, the questioning process doesn’t stop there. Rather, it serves as the beginning of a series of questions, such as… “Did John Smith know something that we don’t know?” “Did John Smith get off a sinking ship before it actually sinks?” “Is our company in financial trouble and we don’t know it.” And… the beat goes on.

These are the kind of ripples that travel much more like a tsunami and their effect is just as destructive. For when attitudes become “infected”, many detrimental things can occur beginning with poor moral and declining productivity.

Given that human nature and human behavior are often quite predictable, the act of a hardworking and talented individual like John Smith suddenly leaving the company and catching his peers off guard is certainly bound to raise some red flags.

Unfortunately, it is also bound to create a very real sense of job insecurity, worry and anxiety. As I recently cited a few weeks back, 70% of American workers don’t feel secure in their job and with their company/organization.

In many cases with diligent-hardworking-talented people… organizations just like yours, don’t see the warning signs until the employee is sitting there smack in front of you informing you that they are leaving and there is nothing more that you or the organization can do to change their mind.

The reality of this scenario which plays out every business day is that all of the compliments, pats on the back, awards, raises and even promotions don’t in the end provide the true measure of what the employee has been longing for all along.

They don’t merely want to be appreciated for their talents, abilities and technical skills… because in the age of robotics, they perceive themselves to simply be one and nothing more in the eye of your organization. As stated earlier, human nature is highly predictable. Ever since their early childhood when these individuals were endlessly trying to gain their parent’s approval, the thing that they wanted most in life was to be “valued” as an “individual”.

Once your organization has been afforded an ample opportunity to measure up and subsequently failed to meet the employee’s litmus test of being truly valued… talent will walk straight out the door and never look back.

It’s important to remember that your organization’s culture and practices are a vivid reflection of your organizations leadership and its attitudes toward employees… And that your people are staring into that mirror 24/7.

As your valued resource partner, we can readily assist your organization, its leadership and your people to… Learn more… Do more… Become more.

Copyright © 2015 Developing Forward | Thomas H. Swank, CBC

2015 HR Survey Results Are In

In case you haven’t reviewed the Harvey Nash HR Survey 2015 as yet, there are a number of highly interesting facts contained in this year’s survey that you should take note of.

 

38% of HR professionals reported that their organization did not have any strategy in place for formal talent management including employee engagement, development and succession planning.

HR professionals stated that they are less satisfied today with the progress being made by diversity issues than one year ago. This sentiment is further reflected by the 7% drop in diversity satisfaction on an overall organizational basis. Nearly half of all organizations (48%) were not happy with the lack of progress with the diversity efforts of their organizations. Which raised the question… Has diversity progress stalled?

Job satisfaction on the part of HR professionals continued to fall over the past year. A significant drop of 5% meant that less than one third (32%) of all HR professionals were “satisfied” in their HR role. Conversely, this translates into 68% of all HR professionals being “less than satisfied” with their professional career role.

The concern over an 11% leap in ageing workers placed this issue second on the list of Labor Market Challenges for the year.

Skills shortages dropped 8% over the past 12 months which also placed it high on the list of Labor Market Challenges for the year.

Talent scarcity has become a greater challenge within the past year which has resulted in placing greater importance on employee engagement, as well as organizational culture and values.

44% of HR professionals are expected to change jobs within the next 24 months.

The “Top 3 Priorities” of Boards for 2015 are:

 

            #1 Priority         Develop leadership capability.

            #2 Priority         Improve talent management.

            #3 Priority         Grow employee engagement.

The “Top 3 Issues” of major concern are:

            #1 Issue            Ageing workforce.

            #2 Issue            Demand for flexible working.

            #3 Issue            Employee education not meeting skill needs.

As you can readily see, the vast majority of the expressed concerns center around two key organizational issues… Leadership Development and Diversity Training (in particular Generational Diversity).

In our role as a Premier Training and Development organization, our two signature development programs are “The Leadership Academy” and our Generational Diversity Program “Leadership For The Ages”.

I invite you to learn why our municipal and corporate clients along with their participants rate our programs so highly in comparison to all other professional training they have previously received.

As a valued resource partner, we can readily assist your organization and its people to… Learn more… Do more… Become more.